Your browser is ancient!
Upgrade to a different browser to experience this site.

Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship: Building Rewarding Ventures

Assessing Strengths or Weaknesses?

Professor Scott DeRue uses his managerial experience to explain how team performance can be driven or hindered by various work factors. This video is part of our Managing Talent MOOC.

Excerpt From

Transcript

0:09 when you think about 0:09 assessing your team your individual team 0:12 members 0:12 the second important question that you 0:16 must 0:16 be able to answer the first one was why 0:19 am i assessing 0:20 and what am i assessing the second 0:23 important question that you must be able 0:25 to answer 0:26 is am i going to focus on weaknesses or 0:28 strengths or both 0:31 so for example quotes from famous people 0:33 that you may or 0:34 may not have heard of newt rockne famous 0:36 notre dame football coach 0:37 said build up your weaknesses until they 0:39 become strengths 0:41 this is a particular perspective which 0:43 is pretty common in organizations today 0:46 let's identify the weaknesses that this 0:49 person has 0:51 and now let's create a development plan 0:54 to work on those weaknesses 0:56 put those put that person in experiences 0:58 where we'll stretch them 1:00 along these weaknesses until those 1:02 weaknesses become strengths 1:04 the gap analysis or what we often call 1:06 the deficit approach 1:08 but the focus here is on weaknesses gaps 1:12 and doing whatever it takes to fill or 1:15 address those gaps 1:17 but there's a different perspective 1:19 which is captured in the strengths 1:21 based perspective and a quote here 1:24 success is achieved by developing our 1:26 strengths not by eliminating 1:29 our weaknesses very different 1:31 perspective 1:33 and so what i want to encourage you to 1:36 think about 1:37 when you are entertaining the idea of 1:40 what assessments to use how to use those 1:42 assessments when coaching and developing 1:44 your talent 1:45 is am i going to focus on weaknesses 1:48 which is pretty typical or standard in 1:50 organizations today 1:52 or am i going to use assessments to 1:54 identify 1:55 their strengths and then figure out ways 1:58 to leverage and develop those strengths 2:00 even 2:01 further or is it going to be some 2:03 combination of the two 2:05 so again the weaknesses approach or the 2:07 gap approach 2:08 is i'm going to use an assessment to 2:10 identify the weakness 2:11 and then create developmental 2:13 experiences to address the weakness 2:15 the strengths-based approach is i'm 2:16 going to use the assessment to identify 2:19 where and how is this person really 2:21 strong 2:22 as an individual or as a team member and 2:25 then figure out ways to use experiences 2:27 to 2:28 leverage and further develop those 2:30 strengths 2:32 so let's talk about that strengths-based 2:35 approach 2:36 there was a book written strengths-based 2:38 leadership 2:39 in that book i found a quote by one of 2:41 the authors who 2:42 said if you spend your life trying to be 2:44 good at everything you will never be 2:45 great at anything 2:48 while our society encourages us to be 2:50 well-rounded this approach 2:52 inadvertently breeds mediocrity 2:55 the great leaders that they studied in 2:57 this book 2:58 are not well-rounded individuals they've 3:00 become world-class 3:02 in a relatively limited number of areas 3:05 of leadership they argue the concept of 3:08 well-roundedness is an illusion 3:11 really all that happens when people try 3:13 to fix their weaknesses is that they 3:14 spend inordinate amounts of time trying 3:16 to become 3:17 marginally better in an area that they 3:20 will never be particularly strong 3:22 that is the essence of the 3:24 strengths-based perspective 3:28 i'll give you a data-driven example from 3:30 the world of sports 3:32 that really illustrates the 3:35 essence the power of this 3:37 strengths-based approach 3:39 tiger woods arguably one of the most 3:42 famous golfers 3:44 in history i went and i 3:47 analyzed his most dominant or successful 3:51 golf season in his career it was in the 3:54 year 2000 3:56 in 2000 he competed in 20 total 3:58 tournaments 4:00 in 13 of those 20 tournaments he 4:03 finished either first or second 4:04 and he finished top 10 in 17 of the 20. 4:08 in terms of the statistics that are used 4:11 to 4:12 measure or assess golfers and their 4:14 performance 4:15 he was number one in greens and 4:17 regulation he was number two in driving 4:20 distance how far he hit it off of the 4:22 t he was number three in a statistic 4:26 called scrambling 4:28 that statistic captures the degree to 4:30 which when golfers hit it 4:32 off course their ability to get it back 4:35 on course and and get it to the whole 4:37 and he earned a significant amount of 4:39 money over 9 million dollars 4:41 in winnings that year when we look at 4:44 his 4:45 dominant performance across that season 4:47 it's really 4:48 easy to conclude that he was perfect he 4:51 was great at everything 4:53 but that's simply not the case if you 4:55 look at other statistics 4:57 he was middle of the road he was 4:59 mediocre 5:01 at things like his ability to get out of 5:03 sand traps 5:04 even putting he was a mediocre 5:07 at his ability to avoid three putting on 5:10 the green 5:12 and so whether it was sand saves or 5:14 putting 5:15 those were not his strengths his 5:17 strengths largely had to do with 5:20 driving the ball getting it to the green 5:23 the long uh the long game the long 5:25 distance 5:25 uh aspects of his golf game and less so 5:29 in the short game aspects of golf 5:32 putting and sand traps and so this is 5:35 someone who 5:37 obviously performed really well at his 5:40 task but he wasn't great at everything 5:43 he was great at a few things 5:45 and then really found ways to leverage 5:47 those few things 5:49 to create success for himself that is 5:51 the essence 5:52 of the strengths-based approach is let's 5:55 identify what are the few areas that 5:57 we're really strong at 5:58 and then put ourselves in positions to 6:00 leverage those strengths 6:02 to in order to enable us to be 6:05 successful gallup did a very 6:09 interesting study of employees around 6:12 the world 6:14 looking at the degree to which employees 6:17 felt that they were able to use their 6:19 strengths every day at work 6:21 the question at work do you have the 6:23 opportunity to do what you do 6:24 best every day almost 200 000 6:27 employees across the globe completed 6:30 this 6:31 survey interestingly eighty percent 6:35 of the employees who completed this 6:37 survey did not feel 6:38 that their strengths were used every day 6:41 but in the organizations where their 6:43 strengths were used 6:45 you saw less employed turnover or 6:48 attrition 6:49 you saw more productive business units 6:51 financially 6:52 better results and then you saw higher 6:55 customer satisfaction scores so it 6:56 wasn't just that the business was 6:58 performing better 6:59 but the customers were actually more 7:01 satisfied 7:03 what we're finding in our research today 7:06 is that 7:07 the traditional weakness approach to 7:09 assessment 7:10 and development is insufficient 7:13 it's not that we want to ignore the 7:15 weaknesses if there are certain 7:17 weaknesses 7:18 that we must improve 7:21 in order to even be viable team members 7:24 and be able to work on 7:26 a specific task we have to meet a 7:28 certain threshold 7:30 but in order to achieve excellence in 7:33 order to achieve 7:34 exceptional results what we're finding 7:37 is that 7:38 leaders and teams are discovering 7:42 through assessment 7:43 what are what are our strengths 7:46 and then finding ways to develop and 7:49 leverage those strengths 7:50 even further nelson mandela 7:55 in his 1995 speech 7:58 at his inauguration quoted the words of 8:02 marianne williamson 8:04 in ways that i think really captures the 8:06 essence 8:07 of this strengths-based approach to 8:10 coaching and developing your talent 8:12 he said again quoting marianne 8:15 williamson 8:16 our deepest fear is not that we are 8:17 inadequate 8:19 our deepest fear is that we are powerful 8:21 beyond measure 8:22 it is our light not our darkness that 8:25 frightens us 8:27 we ask ourselves who am i to be 8:29 brilliant 8:30 gorgeous talented fabulous 8:33 nelson mandela said actually who are we 8:36 not to be those things 8:37 your playing small does not serve the 8:39 world there is nothing enlightened about 8:41 shrinking so that other people won't 8:43 feel insecure around you 8:46 he said we are all meant to shine just 8:49 as children do 8:50 it is not just in some of us it is in 8:52 every one of us 8:54 so again as you think about assessment 8:56 think about not only assessing 8:58 what are people weak at but also what 9:02 are they 9:03 exceptional at and then think about not 9:07 only how can you address the weaknesses 9:09 but also how do you further develop and 9:12 leverage those strengths 9:14 so that your team and the individuals 9:17 working in that team 9:19 can be exceptional and achieve the goals 9:23 and the aspirations that you are setting 9:25 for them 9:25 as their leader