Your browser is ancient!
Upgrade to a different browser to experience this site.

Skip to main content

Climate Change

Kristina Ko on Government Relations

Kristina Ko, Senior Director of Federal Relations for Research, Office of Research at University of Michigan Ann Arbor, speaks about how to effectively dialogue with policy makers from a organizational perspective.

Excerpt From

Transcript

0:00 so thank you so much for joining me 0:02 today I'd like to get us started by 0:04 having you introduce yourself and talk 0:06 about what your role is here at the 0:07 University of Michigan sure my name is 0:09 christina CO and i'm the senior director 0:11 of federal relations for research for 0:13 the office of research got it so what 0:16 sort of experiences have you had an 0:18 engaging with policy and advocacy in 0:21 this space so I've worked in the policy 0:24 world for probably the last 15 years um 0:27 across industry government and most 0:30 currently academia yep of that time I 0:33 spent five years as the health policy 0:35 advisor for the former Senator Carl 0:37 Levin oh wow mm-hmm so that sounds like 0:40 you've got quite a range of experiences 0:42 so do you have a philosophy or approach 0:45 and trying to make these interactions 0:47 effective is there there something that 0:49 you keep in mind with regardless of what 0:52 sector that you're interacting with when 0:53 you're doing policy and advocacy work so 0:55 I try to keep in mind the point of view 0:57 of the stakeholder so in this case and 0:59 my current role it's the policymaker so 1:01 what is the policymaker interested in 1:03 what committees of jurisdiction do they 1:05 serve on what is what are the interest 1:07 of his constituents his or her 1:08 constituents sure I keep in mind the 1:11 interests of the policymaker yep and 1:14 then I try to bring in I try to ensure 1:18 that the message that we're bringing to 1:19 him is hers clear yep so we want to 1:23 ensure that if we haven't asked that the 1:25 ask is very clear so of staff walk away 1:27 and they're confused about what we're 1:28 asking then we have not done a good job 1:30 sure if we're trying to wait raise 1:33 awareness about an issue that we think 1:36 the policymaker is interested in then we 1:38 try to make sure that we're we're very 1:41 clear and concise about that issue so 1:43 what are we trying to highlight what is 1:46 the impact on the local state or nation 1:49 what does that translate into jobs 1:53 economy whatnot so we try to factor in 1:57 all of the different varying factors 1:59 that we think that the policymaker would 2:00 be interested in absolutely that makes a 2:02 lot of sense so that sounds like you're 2:04 really just getting to know your 2:05 audience and the hunger set or respect 2:07 so how much time do you spend like 2:09 really doing that homework to try and 2:11 figure out what that individual policy 2:13 makers 2:14 turns are I think we've won we try to 2:17 build relationships with our policy 2:18 shorter's in their offices and so you 2:20 know it's just paying attention and when 2:23 you have an opportunity we ask their 2:24 staff you know what is your boss 2:25 interested in what are the things that 2:27 you're interested in we followed the 2:29 Committees of jurisdiction that they're 2:30 on what is the committee's what are the 2:32 committee is looking at what is relevant 2:34 on the hill what is the hot topics on 2:36 the hill and you just constantly it's a 2:39 constant dialogue it's back and forth 2:41 where they're asking you questions 2:43 you're asking their them questions so I 2:46 think that if you just stay engaged with 2:47 the policymakers it's it's a it happens 2:50 naturally yeah our time if you're it's 2:52 like any relationship building so that 2:55 sounds like there are both probably some 2:57 rewards and challenges with building 2:59 those types of relationships could you 3:00 outline those a little bit for me well I 3:03 think the rewards for me at least is an 3:05 ideological one right I I really want to 3:08 make a positive impact on our nation and 3:10 society and the greater good and I think 3:13 that I'm really lucky to be working for 3:15 a university that has a long-standing 3:17 role in doing that and yeah and it's 3:20 part of the mission of the University of 3:21 Michigan to serve the nation and so I 3:24 feel lucky lucky and it's rewarding to 3:28 advocate for science for science 3:31 benefits our health our stabilities it 3:35 has a societal impact its national 3:38 security it impacts everything that we 3:40 do it ensures that we're a world leader 3:42 and we're innovating and it supports our 3:45 economy so there's research impacts our 3:47 lives in so many different ways and so 3:49 it's something that you can feel good 3:51 about Absalom I would say that the 3:54 challenges I think our challenges that 3:56 are similar and anything that you do it 3:58 takes time and things don't happen 4:01 overnight you impact doesn't happen 4:03 overnight yep and so I think that 4:05 sometimes you know we are working on a 4:08 societal challenge or we're working on 4:10 something and we expect change to happen 4:12 but it changes incremental and change is 4:15 slow and I think that that can be very 4:17 frustrating Shore requires a lot of 4:19 patience exactly yeah oh that makes a 4:22 lot of sense so we touched on this a 4:24 couple of minutes ago but I want to sort 4:26 of come back to the idea about 4:28 what is that you're interacting with so 4:29 you mentioned policymakers and you also 4:31 mentioned your staff so can you get 4:32 really concrete about who it is that you 4:35 work with in your role so we work with 4:37 legislators we work with legislators 4:39 staff and we work with agency officials 4:41 got it and what's different about these 4:44 particular individuals compared to other 4:46 groups that you might interact with like 4:48 media people like people Jenna lists or 4:50 people who are trying to cover 4:51 government relations so I don't 4:53 typically work with media or journalists 4:56 but I would say if I was to guess what 4:58 the difference is or what the different 4:59 interests are between let's say 5:01 legislators and media i would say 5:03 legislators are very interested in 5:05 issues that impact their constituents 5:06 sure medium might be more interested in 5:10 telling two sides of a story or two 5:12 sides of a date debate or they might be 5:14 looking for a breakthrough news story or 5:17 something really innovative for 5:19 something really new and highlighting 5:20 something that isn't widely reported on 5:24 already absolutely yeah so they're 5:26 looking for really interesting stories 5:28 and informing maybe the public on an 5:31 interesting debate so can you dig in a 5:33 little bit more about the types of 5:34 things that you do to prepare and how 5:37 you try to meet that need of interacting 5:40 with a policymaker to address the needs 5:42 and concerns of his or her constituents 5:44 so one as I said it's knowing your 5:47 policy makers so what are they 5:48 interested in having a very clear 5:51 message and very clear whether the 5:53 message is hey we're highlighting this 5:56 because we know it would be of interest 5:57 into you or if maybe it's an ask maybe 6:01 it's you know we've confronted some sort 6:03 of barrier that makes it hard for our 6:05 faculty to either educate students or do 6:08 research and if we think that the 6:09 policymaker can help with it then it's 6:11 you know clearly communicating that to 6:14 them and Ashley am how you know like 6:16 what what should we be doing or how can 6:18 they help but it's having I mean I think 6:21 the key is to really having a clear 6:23 message and knowing what the opportunity 6:26 is I mean I think that ultimately staff 6:28 are extremely busy yeah and they're 6:31 fielding a lot of meetings and they have 6:32 a broad constituency that they're 6:34 interested in or they're concerned about 6:36 or that they're working with and so I am 6:40 we are very strategic about one 6:42 we approach them when we think that they 6:44 can help us what you you know so we're 6:47 very mindful of their time and 6:49 respectful of the time that they have to 6:52 work with us absolutely so it sounds 6:54 like you spend a lot of time preparing 6:56 and then thinking out when you want to 6:58 deliver a message and then what that 6:59 message is so that it has the maximal 7:01 impact is that right or you know is it a 7:03 message that they can help with yeah 7:05 message so we don't bring you know we're 7:07 very strategic about thinking about you 7:09 know is this something that they can 7:11 help with this is something that we 7:12 should go to them with and so there's a 7:17 lot of thought that goes into how we 7:19 work with our legislature they are 7:21 legislators and their staff but it's 7:23 also being responsive so if you know we 7:28 work I think one of the reasons why our 7:30 legislators and their staff work with us 7:32 is because we're very responsive so 7:34 they're confronted with something or 7:36 they have a question about something and 7:38 they reach out to us you know they work 7:41 on very tight timelines yeah so I am 7:44 always I always try to ensure that we're 7:46 very responsive we get the information 7:50 that they're looking for we've vetted it 7:52 they know it's good they know that it's 7:54 based on sound resort research and so I 7:58 think part of it is creating a 8:01 relationship of trust where they trust 8:04 what we're giving them and we're 8:06 responsive timely to their needs so 8:10 you're really listening to make sure 8:12 that you're also filling the niche that 8:13 they need you to fill out any given 8:15 moment yes I would say a large role is 8:17 listening and making sure that we 8:19 understand what they're looking for also 8:20 yeah and then sometimes it's 8:22 anticipating their needs right so if we 8:24 know that they're really interested in 8:25 an issue and we know something's coming 8:27 down a pipeline you know we'll also 8:29 share that with them and it's it's so 8:31 it's a constant collaborative 8:34 relationship I think yeah absolutely 8:35 that makes a lot of sense so you spoke 8:38 to this sort of tangentially but I want 8:40 to ask the question very directly it 8:43 sounds like it really depends on the 8:45 moment in time and what you think that 8:49 you want to get across and what's going 8:51 to be of concern to the legislature but 8:53 when you approach them what 8:55 specific goals do you have so the goal 8:58 is either maybe the goal is that we just 9:00 want to highlight something yeah we want 9:02 to highlight something that is happening 9:04 in their district or in the state that 9:06 we think that they should be aware of 9:09 shouldn't that they should know about we 9:12 could be going to them to share with 9:14 them you know the importance of federal 9:16 funding for a research and you know why 9:19 is it important and the types of 9:21 benefits that federal funding has had on 9:23 research in the past that type of thing 9:24 exactly yeah it could be that you know 9:28 we faced a barrier to as I mentioned 9:32 before you know we're facing a barrier 9:34 that is preventing our faculty from 9:37 being able to do their research or to 9:39 educate students yeah and you know we 9:43 talked out that barrier with them and 9:44 find ways that they could possibly help 9:46 provide relief yeah or we're 9:49 highlighting something that is impacting 9:51 research or something that we're 9:53 concerned about or or maybe we just know 9:57 that there and they're specifically 9:58 interested in a specific issue and we 10:01 want to be able to provide the resources 10:03 for them and the guidance or maybe you 10:07 know just so that they know that we have 10:09 the expertise and I mean the goal 10:11 ultimately the goal is for them to I 10:13 mean the research the University of 10:16 Michigan's a large research university 10:18 we get a lot of federal investments in 10:21 research and as part of that you know we 10:24 have a duty to you know showcase what 10:26 are we doing with those federal funds we 10:29 it's important for us to show that we're 10:31 good stewards of this piece taxpayer 10:33 investments and it's very important yeah 10:36 absolutely so it's just to reiterate it 10:39 sounds like the goal really depends on a 10:41 couple of things it depends on the 10:43 relationship that you've built up with 10:45 them in the past and what their current 10:46 needs are and making sure that you 10:49 highlight the value of federal research 10:51 or federal support of research and also 10:53 specific advances that the University of 10:55 Michigan has so sounds like it's really 10:56 context-dependent absolutely absolutely 11:00 well I want to just thank you for thank 11:03 you for your time because sharing your 11:05 thoughts with audience in particular 11:07 with these types of audiences ism 11:09 valuable so I really appreciate it 11:10 absolutely