A little dry/slow but very well done. The Python end was a little tricky, but probably because I rushed the labs and didn’t take notes on code.
Great course, helped me understand some hard (for me at least) topics, it was of great value!
Muy buen curso, que ofrece la oportunidad de aprender a analizar datos con Python.
It's excellent course
It was irrelevant and contained unnecessary content. Why are we drowning in theoretical statistical topics instead of focusing on Python? Thus far, the course has been more about statistics than actually working with Python! I am here to address my statistical needs using Python, not to become an expert in statistics. Unfortunately, this course seems to be doing just the opposite.
Good statistics content, but it is not interactive and the testing is weak. Python learning is extremely unforgivable. There are no step-by-step videos, and no theory explanation either, which makes understanding python syntax and functions (particularly in the context of data science) extremely difficult. As someone with an advanced java background, I expected the python learning to be smooth. Unfortunately, I was thrown into the deep end with no life jacket, as the course went from basic variables to creating scatterplots and manipulating datasets in less than a day. This wouldn't be as bad if there were video instructions, but there are none. The "interactive labs" are not interactive, but rather, are just vague notes that don't truly teach or test you on anything. After completing week 2, I left with nothing other than 5 hours of wasted time.
The courses is supposed to help students learn how to use Python to understand and visualize data. However, the course lacks focus on the subject as well as tasks for practicing Python code. Lack of practice. The peer-reviewed tasks are hilarious - you will be asked to describe how you'd visualize metrics in (Python you would think? No!) words. This is so easy to turn this task into something actually useful: create a notebook with preloaded data and ask students to come up with metrics and visualize them. No-one came here to practice English writing skills, and this shows in the tasks of the students. The quizzes are easy, the final quiz has all answers in hints which are not even hidden. That's actually a pretty good representation of the course creators' confidence in the students' knowledge after the course - we know you didn't learn anything, so we will just give you all the answers. Concentration on the course goal. The course is too short for trying to pack all the information in it. The last week was interesting, but if I wanted to learn about study design, I'd take a course on Study design. A lot of topics can be described as 'Understanding and Visualizing Data', and the difference between a well-designed course with thought-through structure and this course is that the good course is focused around the narrow subject (e.g. using Python for understanding the data) and delves as deep as possible instead of throw in different topics that are related to 'understanding data' in such a short course. And one last thing I would like to bring up is the students teaching in the course. I understand that it was probably the project they got credits for, and the professors thought that it's be a great practice for them. This is a great initiative, but the Coursera students actually pay for this course, and, I am sorry, but the students lectures were bad for the most part - the explanations are not coherent, the repetitions, the 'we are not going discuss that' (then please structure the lection the way the you don't use the function you don't want to explain). While it's understandable that students need more practice in teaching (they are students after all), the question arises as to why one should pay to listen to their 'end-of-the-course project'.
The ads is misleading and inaccurate! Most of course is delivered by undergrad students without any in-depth explanations and they literally skim read the contents for you! Nothing special! The name of UoM fooled me to register! However, No professor at UoM is teaching this cheap course.
The course material seemed a bit scattered, possibly because of there being at least five presenters. The material wasn't really that focused on data visualization and veered into esoteric (but interesting) topics like non-probability sampling. The pizza memorandum assignment seemed quite pointless. More work with Python labs would have been my preferrence.
The title of the course is a bit misleading. The focus is really on some basic Statistics, with Python notebooks thrown in to demonstrate some of those concepts. However, you won't get much help understanding Python. Even the workbooks involved use some interesting methods/libraries, but not much detail in the course about them, other than the particular use they come up in. It's a 4 week course, but can easily be completed in about a week, possibly less. If you already have a fair foundation in Stats, this course probably won't add much value. I did enjoy the instructors and they were trying to keep things interesting.