Ratings and Reviews for Evaluating Designs with Users

<co-content><text>The peer review system is highly flawed. In this course, you are asked to create a very time consuming report - it said you can expect to take 2-3 weeks, then you are immediately asked to peer review /six/ of your peer’s same reports after you finally submit it. It took a very, very long time to read their reports and then review them, so it increases the likelihood of peers not fully reading or correctly grading them at all - especially when the majority of submitted reports appear fraudulent or weren’t taken seriously. Those are the peers we need to rely on for a passing score, for something that represents 35% of the grade? At least one of the questions that score this module involves a requirement that wasn’t listed in the instructions at all. They need to enable the AI scoring on all assignments so learners don’t get stuck in this kind of flawed bottleneck. </text></co-content>

<co-content><text>It is very disrepectul to require students to review others work to advance, if they are students it means that they are in the same level than me and I'm not qualified to review their work. worst of all: I also have to wait for my work to be reviewed by others in the same level than me to advance. I'm suck right now waiting for others (non qualified students) to review my work and I'm wasting valuable time from my vacations I reserved for this course waiting.</text></co-content>

<co-content><text>very good</text></co-content>

<co-content><text>good</text></co-content>

good

muy bueno

Bien

excelente

Excelentes bases y aspectos a tener en cuenta en las validaciones con usuarios

Effective Course